.png)
Practice and Match Load Characteristics of Elite Ice Hockey - Article Review
Ice hockey is a dynamic and demanding sport that requires precise training and performance optimization. A recent study by Nightingale et al. (2024) sheds light on the practice and match load characteristics of elite men's ice hockey, providing valuable insights for strength and conditioning coaches. This blog post will review the key findings of the study and discuss their implications for training and performance management in ice hockey.
Key Findings
Positional Differences
The study revealed significant differences between forwards and defensemen in both matches and practices:
- Forwards exhibited higher absolute and relative values for most metrics in both matches and practices compared to defensemen.
- Defensemen had significantly higher time on ice (TOI) values than forwards.
Match vs. Practice Demands
Regardless of position, matches had significantly higher workload demands than practices. This highlights the importance of tailoring practice sessions to adequately prepare players for the intensity of match play.
Time on Ice Distribution
Ice time was not evenly distributed among players of the same position but remained consistent for individual athletes. This finding emphasizes the need for personalized training approaches to account for varying match demands.
External Workload Metrics
The study utilized various metrics to quantify external workload, including PlayerLoad™ (PL), On-Ice Load (OIL), Skating Load (SL), Explosive Efforts (EE), and High Force Strides (HFS). These metrics provide a comprehensive view of the physical demands placed on ice hockey players.
Practical Implications for Strength and Conditioning Coaches
1. Position-specific training: Design training programs that address the unique demands of forwards and defensemen, considering their different workload profiles and time on ice requirements.
2. Match simulation: Incorporate high-intensity drills in practice sessions that mimic match demands to better prepare players for competition.
3. Individualized load management: Monitor and adjust training loads based on each player's typical time on ice and workload patterns to optimize performance and reduce injury risk.
4. Comprehensive monitoring: Utilize a combination of external workload metrics (e.g., PL, OIL, SL, EE, HFS) to gain a holistic understanding of player demands and inform training decisions.
5. Periodization strategies: Develop periodization plans that account for the differences between match and practice loads, ensuring players are adequately prepared for the higher demands of competition.
Conclusion
This study provides valuable insights into the external workload demands of elite men's ice hockey. By understanding the positional differences, match vs. practice demands, and individual player characteristics, strength and conditioning coaches can develop more effective training programs. Implementing these findings into practice can help optimize player performance, reduce injury risk, and ultimately contribute to team success on the ice.
Article PDF Below:
留言