Shifting Gears: How Change of Direction Ability Can Impact Athletic Success

Change of direction (COD) ability is a critical factor in athletic performance across various team sports. This skill allows athletes to rapidly alter their momentum and move in a new direction, often making the difference between success and failure in crucial moments. Whether it's a soccer player evading defenders to create a goal-scoring opportunity or a rugby player swiftly maneuvering through opponents, COD ability can significantly impact an athlete's effectiveness on the field of play. Evaluating this skill has become increasingly important for coaches and sports scientists, with various tests and metrics being developed to assess and improve an athlete's change of direction speed and agility. Understanding the components that contribute to COD ability and how it can be measured provides valuable insights for enhancing athletic performance and tailoring training programs to individual needs.

Change of Direction - refers to any activity that involves a rapid whole-body movement with a change of velocity or direction. Traditionally, COD is often pre-planned, meaning the athlete knows in advance when and how they will change direction.

Agility - a rapid whole-body movement with change of velocity or direction in response to a stimulus. Agility is not just about physical movement; it also encompasses cognitive elements such as visual processing, timing, reaction time, perception, and anticipation.

Several key components contribute to an athlete's change of direction (COD) ability. Physical qualities, including muscular strength, power, and speed, form the foundation of effective COD performance. Specifically, eccentric strength plays a crucial role in the deceleration phase, allowing athletes to quickly reduce their momentum before changing direction. Maximum strength, horizontally-directed strength, and strength at long muscle lengths also transfer well to COD ability. Biomechanical factors, such as the ability to generate horizontal propulsive force in the final step and minimize vertical braking force, are associated with faster COD performance. Additionally, perceptual and cognitive qualities come into play, particularly when considering agility, which involves responding to external stimuli like opponents or the ball. These factors collectively determine an athlete's capacity to rapidly and efficiently change direction, making COD ability a complex and multifaceted skill essential for success in many sports.

What are some ways to evaluate COD Ability?

The T-Test, 5-10-5 Drill (Pro Agility Shuttle), Illinois Agility Test, and 505 Agility Test have emerged as versatile and widely-adopted assessments for evaluating change of direction (COD) ability across various sports in a closed environment. These tests have gained popularity over the years due to their ability to measure crucial components of athletic performance that are common to many team sports, including soccer, American football, basketball, field hockey and lacrosse.

• The T-Test, with its combination of forward sprinting, lateral shuffling, and backpedaling, effectively simulates the multi-directional movements required in court and field sports.

• The 5-10-5 Drill assess an athlete's ability to perform rapid directional changes, speed, explosiveness, and control during COD tasks.

• The Illinois Agility Test provides a comprehensive evaluation of acceleration, agility, and foot speed within a single drill, making it highly applicable to sports requiring complex movement patterns.

• The 505 Agility Test focuses on the critical ability to decelerate and re-accelerate quickly, a skill essential in sports that involve frequent stops and starts.

  
  

  By incorporating one or more of these four tests into assessment protocols, coaches and sports scientists can gain valuable insights into an athlete's COD and COD ability, regardless of their specific sport, enabling more targeted training and performance enhancement strategies.

In recent years, the field of athletic performance assessment and training has seen a significant shift from traditional non-reactive agility drills to more advanced reactive agility tests. These tests are evolving to address the limitations of traditional planned COD tests by incorporating reactive elements and sport-specific movements. For instance, reactive agility tests using LED systems, visual stimuli and auditory stimuli are now differentiating between skill levels more effectively than pre-planned COD tests. We will provide a quick overview of some new tests gaining popularity in the field of sport performance and sport science.

The Modified Agility T-Test (MAT) combines the traditional T test with reactive components. practitioners have incorporated Visual stimuli to display directional cues, auditory cues to signal directional change, and Opponent or 'defender' moving to signal directional change. One of the primary advantages of the MAT is its focus on both speed and agility within a defined space, closely reflecting the dynamic movements required in competitive sports. This method effectively assesses an athlete’s ability to accelerate, decelerate, and change directions, all of which are essential components for success in sports McBurnie & Dos’Santos (2021). The Modified Agility T-Test (MAT) is a reliable assessment tool for assessing agility, particularly when enhanced with reactive components to better simulate sport-specific demands.

The Y-Shaped Agility Test is a simple yet effective way to measure an athlete’s ability to change direction quickly in response to a stimulus, making it ideal for sports that require agility. The test starts with athletes sprinting straight through gates arranged in a Y-shape. After passing the middle gate, they must react to a visual or auditory cue to decide whether to sprint left or right toward the target gates. This test combines reaction time, sprint speed, and directional changes, offering a more game-like assessment compared to traditional planned COD drills. Originally designed for basketball, it has been adapted for various sports and is highly reliable for measuring performance. Research shows that faster sprint times and better reactive strength are key factors in excelling at this test. By mimicking real-game scenarios, the Y-Shaped Agility Test helps coaches evaluate both physical and cognitive skills, making it a valuable tool for improving sport-specific agility.

5 0 5 COD Ratio as a method to measure change of direction (COD) ability relative to linear speed gained traction in the early 2010s, with significant advancements in its application occurring around 2016. Researchers like Nimphius et al. introduced the "COD deficit" concept, which isolates COD ability by subtracting an athlete's 10-meter sprint time from their 5-0-5 time. This approach highlighted the importance of deceleration, turning, and reacceleration phases in COD performance, which are not captured in linear sprint tests. The COD ratio became more widely recognized as a practical tool for coaches and practitioners because it provides insight into an athlete's efficiency in changing direction independent of their straight-line speed. By identifying inefficiencies in deceleration or reacceleration, the COD ratio allows for more targeted training interventions to improve overall COD, Agility and sport-specific performance.

5 0 5 COD Ratio = 5 0 5 Time / (2x 10m Sprint Time)

0.70 = 2.45 / (2 x 1.75)

0.70 = 2.45 / 3.50

Having examined various methods for evaluating COD ability, including traditional and reactive COD/agility tests, as well as the COD ratio for assessing efficiency, it's clear that COD is a multifaceted skill that needs to be trained and evaluated. Now, let's shift our focus to the foundational elements that underpin an athlete's COD proficiency: the physical qualities. Understanding the specific physical attributes that contribute to effective change of direction is crucial for developing targeted training programs to enhance athletic performance.

Eccentric Strength and Deceleration Ability

Eccentric strength plays a crucial role in deceleration during change of direction (COD) tasks, particularly in the braking phase preceding a directional change. The quadriceps muscles act eccentrically to control knee flexion and absorb kinetic energy, reducing stress on the knee joint and stabilizing the lower limb. Research has shown that athletes with greater eccentric strength, especially in the quadriceps and hamstrings, demonstrate superior deceleration abilities and faster COD performance. Evaluation of eccentric strength and its application in COD tasks often involves isokinetic strength testing, with a focus on the quadriceps-to-hamstring strength ratio. Additionally, deceleration capacity tests, such as single-leg landing assessments and multi-directional deceleration drills, are used to assess an athlete's ability to generate and control eccentric force during high-speed deceleration. Biomechanical assessments during COD maneuvers can also reveal the efficiency of force production and redirection, providing insights into an athlete's deceleration proficiency. Another popular way to evaluate eccentric strength and decelerations is through Countermovement jumps (CMJ) on force plates along with Drop Jumps - both test types also allow for practitioners to provide ratio based metrics that can allow for a deeper dive into athletes eccentric and deceleration abilities.

CMJ Metrics: studies show strong correlations (r = 0.61–0.69) between CMJ Eccentric Peak Force /Eccentric Mean Force and eccentric back squat strength, making them valid proxies for evaluating COD deceleration capacity.

Drop Jump Metrics: Landing Phase Metrics such as peak landing force, time to stabilization, eccentric rate of force development (which can be impacted by drop height), eccentric impulse, and reactive strength index are metrics that can be used to effectively evaluate eccentric abilities. These metrics can be beneficial and are indeed effective for evaluating eccentric force and the stretch-shortening cycle efficiency.

Eccentric Utilization Ratio (EUR): Compares CMJ height to Squat Jump Height. Higher EUR values (>1.1) indicate better utilization of eccentric forces during the stretch-shortening cycle.

Dynamic Strength Index (DSI) - CMJ Eccentric Peak Force to Concentric Impulse (via Squat Jump), provides insights into an athletes force redistribution capacity during COD. Both jumps provide insights into muscular performance, with the eccentric phase of the CMJ harnessing elastic energy stored during downward motion, while the SJ predominantly relies on concentric force production without significant elastic resource utilization (Balázs et al., 2025). In the currently context, A DSI of <0.8 suggests inadequate eccentric strength for rapid deceleration demands.

Perceptual and Cognitive Qualities

Beyond physical attributes, an often-overlooked aspect of COD ability lies in the realm of perceptual and cognitive skills. While strength, power, and biomechanics provide the engine for directional changes, it is an athlete's ability to perceive, anticipate, and react that truly unlocks their COD/Agility potential.

While COD drills often focus on pre-planned movements, true agility requires an athlete to react to a stimulus, be it a visual cue, an auditory signal, or the movement of an opponent. This necessitates a complex interplay of cognitive functions, including visual processing, anticipation, and reaction time. Athletes must quickly perceive their surroundings, predict the actions of others, and make split-second decisions to optimize their change of direction. The ability to effectively process information and react accordingly is what separates a merely quick athlete from a truly agile one, particularly in dynamic and unpredictable sporting environments. As such, training paradigms are evolving to incorporate reactive elements that challenge and enhance these crucial perceptual and cognitive skills, ultimately leading to improved COD ability in competition.

Conclusion

Change of direction ability is a crucial skill in many sports, encompassing physical, biomechanical, and cognitive elements. Effective evaluation of COD performance has evolved from traditional pre-planned tests to more advanced reactive assessments that better simulate real-game scenarios.

Key takeaways include:

1. COD ability involves multiple components, including eccentric strength, deceleration, power, and perceptual-cognitive skills.

2. Various tests like the T-Test, 5-10-5 Drill, Illinois Agility Test, and 505 Agility Test are widely used to assess COD performance.

3. Newer reactive agility tests, such as the Modified Agility T-Test and Y-Shaped Agility Test, offer more sport-specific evaluations.

4. The COD ratio and deficit concepts provide insights into an athlete's directional change efficiency independent of linear speed.

5. Understanding and improving COD ability can significantly enhance overall athletic performance across many team sports.

To conclude, the field of change of direction (COD) assessment and training continues to evolve, offering coaches, athletes, and sports scientists increasingly sophisticated tools to enhance performance. As research progresses, we can expect to see further refinements in testing protocols, training methodologies, and our understanding of the intricate interplay between physical and cognitive factors in COD ability. By embracing these advancements and integrating them into comprehensive training programs, athletes can unlock new levels of agility, responsiveness, and overall effectiveness in their respective sports. The future of COD development promises to be an exciting frontier in sports performance, potentially revolutionizing how athletes prepare for and excel in the dynamic, fast-paced environments of competitive play.

References

Born, D. P., Zinner, C., Duking, P., & Sperlich, B. (2016). Multi-directional sprint training improves change-of-direction speed and reactive agility in young highly trained soccer players. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 15(2), 314-319.

Brughelli, M., Cronin, J., Levin, G., & Chaouachi, A. (2008). Understanding change of direction ability in sport: A review of resistance training studies. Sports Medicine, 38(12), 1045-1063.

Gabbett, T. J., Kelly, J. N., & Sheppard, J. M. (2008). Speed, change of direction speed, and reactive agility of rugby league players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22(1), 174-181.

Loturco, I., Jeffreys, I., Kobal, R., Abad, C. C. C., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Pereira, L. A., ... & Nakamura, F. Y. (2022). Change of direction performance in elite players from different team sports. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 36(2), 379-385.

Young, W. B., & Farrow, D. (2006). A review of agility: Practical applications for strength and conditioning. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 28(5), 24-29.

Young, W. B., James, R., & Montgomery, I. (2002). Is muscle power related to running speed with changes of direction? Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 42(3), 282-288.

Bampouras, T. M., & Dewhurst, S. (2011). An investigation in to the physical determinants of Agility Performance. University of Cumbria.

Pauole, K., Madole, K., Garhammer, J., Lacourse, M., & Rozenek, R. (2000). Reliability and Validity of the T-Test as a Measure of Agility, Leg Power, and Leg Speed in College-Aged Men and Women. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 14(4), 443-450.

Ucan, I. (2021). Selection of agility tests according to sports branches in terms of motoric properties. Educational Research and Reviews, 16(2), 23-30.

Zemková, E., & Hamar, D. (2014). Agility performance in athletes of different sport specializations. Acta Gymnica, 44(3), 133-140.

Chaabene, H., Prieske, O., Negra, Y., & Granacher, U. (2018). Change of direction speed: Toward a strength training approach with accentuated eccentric muscle actions. Sports Medicine, 48(8), 1773-1779.

Dos'Santos, T., Thomas, C., Comfort, P., & Jones, P. A. (2018). The effect of angle and velocity on change of direction biomechanics: An angle-velocity trade-off. Sports Medicine, 48(10), 2235-2253.

Lockie, R. G., Schultz, A. B., Callaghan, S. J., & Jeffriess, M. D. (2014). The effects of traditional and enforced stopping speed and agility training on multidirectional speed and athletic function. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(6), 1538-1551.

Spiteri, T., Nimphius, S., Hart, N. H., Specos, C., Sheppard, J. M., & Newton, R. U. (2014). Contribution of strength characteristics to change of direction and agility performance in female basketball athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(9), 2415-2423.

Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., & Stone, M. H. (2016). The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Medicine, 46(10), 1419-1449.

Dos'Santos, T., Thomas, C., Jones, P. A., & Comfort, P. (2019). Assessing asymmetries in change of direction speed performance: Application of change of direction deficit. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(11), 2953-2961.

Nimphius, S., Callaghan, S. J., Bezodis, N. E., & Lockie, R. G. (2018). Change of direction and agility tests: Challenging our current measures of performance. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 40(1), 26-38.

Nimphius, S., Callaghan, S. J., Spiteri, T., & Lockie, R. G. (2016). Change of direction deficit: A more isolated measure of change of direction performance than total 505 time. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(11), 3024-3032.

Nimphius, S., Geib, G., Spiteri, T., & Carlisle, D. (2013). "Change of direction deficit" measurement in Division I American football players. Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning, 21(S2), 115-117.

Chang, Y.-C., Chiang, C.-Y., Chen, K.-W., Liang, J.-M., Wang, H.-K., & Hsu, W.-L. (2022). Using the Countermovement Jump Metrics to Assess Dynamic Eccentric Strength: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16135

Balázs, B., Sebesi, B., Cselkó, A., & Váczi, M. (2025). Negligible contribution of body density to in-water vertical jump performance in elite male water polo players. Plos One, 20(1), e0311273.